This page is part of the MII Implementation Guide Seltene Erkrankungen (v2027.0.0-ballot: 2027 Ballot 1) based on FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) R4. This is the current published version in its permanent home (it will always be available at this URL). For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

Coding Best Practices

Avoiding redundancy

Problem

Not every diagnosis needs every available coding system. Excessive multiple coding can lead to:

• Redundancy and data bloat
• Inconsistencies between different coding systems
• Reduced maintainability

Solution: targeted coding

Recommended coding strategy

1. Primary coding systems by diagnosis type

For CLINICAL diagnoses

• ICD-10-GM: mandatory (billing/statistics in the German healthcare system)
• Orpha codes: mandatory for rare diseases
• HPO codes: recommended for phenotypic description

For GENETIC diagnoses

• Orpha codes: mandatory for rare diseases
• OMIM codes: strongly recommended for genetic entities
• ICD-10-GM: optional (often unspecific for genetic variants)

2. Context-dependent coding systems

HPO codes

• Use for: clinical diagnoses (MII_PR_SE_ClinicalDiagnosis)
• Purpose: phenotypic description
• Optional for: genetic diagnoses (if the phenotype is relevant)

OMIM codes

• Use for: genetic diagnoses (MII_PR_SE_GeneticDiagnosis)
• Purpose: genetic disease entity
• Do not use for: purely clinical diagnoses without genetic confirmation

SNOMED CT

• Use when:
  • No more specific coding is available
  • International interoperability is required
  • Complex clinical concepts need to be represented
• Avoid when: Orpha/OMIM are sufficient

Decision matrix

Diagnosis type	ICD-10-GM	Orpha	HPO	OMIM	SNOMED CT
Clinical RD diagnosis	✅ Mandatory	✅ Mandatory	✅ Recommended	❌ Do not use	⚠️ Optional
Genetic RD diagnosis	⚠️ Optional	✅ Mandatory	⚠️ Optional	✅ Strongly recommended	⚠️ Optional
Suspected diagnosis	✅ Mandatory	⚠️ If possible	✅ For symptoms	❌ Do not use	⚠️ Optional

Practical examples

✅ CORRECT: focused coding

Clinical diagnosis (ICD-10-GM required)

Instance: marfan-clinical-focused
InstanceOf: MII_PR_SE_ClinicalDiagnosis
* code.coding[icd10-gm] = $ICD10GM#Q87.4 "Marfan-Syndrom"
* code.coding[orphanet] = http://www.orpha.net#558 "Marfan syndrome"
* code.coding[omim] = http://omim.org#154700 "Marfan syndrome"
// OMIM used for genetic coding

Genetic diagnosis (ICD-10-GM optional)

Instance: sma-genetic-focused
InstanceOf: MII_PR_SE_GeneticDiagnosis
* code.coding[orphanet] = http://www.orpha.net#83330 "SMA type 1"
* code.coding[omim] = http://omim.org#253300 "Spinal muscular atrophy, type I"
// ICD-10-GM can be omitted for a purely genetic diagnosis
// HPO optional, only if the phenotype is to be documented

Genetic diagnosis with ICD-10 (if clinically relevant)

Instance: cf-genetic-with-clinical
InstanceOf: MII_PR_SE_GeneticDiagnosis
* code.coding[icd10-gm] = $ICD10GM#E84.0 "Zystische Fibrose mit Lungenmanifestationen"
* code.coding[orphanet] = http://www.orpha.net#586 "Cystic fibrosis"
* code.coding[omim] = http://omim.org#219700 "Cystic fibrosis"
// ICD-10 useful here because the clinical manifestation is specified

❌ WRONG: excessive coding

Instance: overencoded-diagnosis
InstanceOf: Condition
* code.coding[0] = $ICD10GM#Q87.4 "Marfan-Syndrom"
* code.coding[1] = http://www.orpha.net#558 "Marfan syndrome"
* code.coding[2] = $SCT#19346006 "Marfan syndrome"
* code.coding[3] = http://omim.org#154700 "Marfan syndrome"
* code.coding[4] = $UMLS#C0024796 "Marfan Syndrome"
* code.coding[5] = $MeSH#D008382 "Marfan Syndrome"
// Too many redundant codes!

Special scenarios

Diagnosis progression

When modeling diagnostic courses:

1. Suspicion (screening)
   • ICD-10-GM: mandatory
   • Orpha: if a specific RD is suspected
   • HPO: for symptom description
   • OMIM: do not use
2. Clinical diagnosis
   • ICD-10-GM: mandatory
   • Orpha: mandatory
   • HPO: recommended
   • OMIM: do not use
3. Genetically confirmed
   • ICD-10-GM: optional (only if clinically relevant)
   • Orpha: mandatory
   • HPO: optional (if phenotypically relevant)
   • OMIM: strongly recommended

Purely genetic vs. clinical-genetic diagnoses

Purely genetic findings

// Example: carrier status without symptoms
Instance: carrier-status-sma
InstanceOf: MII_PR_SE_GeneticDiagnosis
* code.coding[orphanet] = http://www.orpha.net#83330 "SMA"
* code.coding[omim] = http://omim.org#253300 "SMA type I"
* code.text = "Heterozygote SMN1-Mutation (Anlageträger)"
// No ICD-10, since no clinical manifestation

Clinical-genetic diagnosis

// Example: symptomatic patient with genetic confirmation
Instance: symptomatic-genetic-diagnosis
InstanceOf: MII_PR_SE_GeneticDiagnosis
* code.coding[icd10-gm] = $ICD10GM#G12.0 "Infantile spinale Muskelatrophie"
* code.coding[orphanet] = http://www.orpha.net#83330 "SMA type 1"
* code.coding[omim] = http://omim.org#253300 "SMA type I"
// ICD-10 useful, since a clinical manifestation is present

Quality criteria

Minimal requirements

Clinical diagnosis

• ICD-10-GM code present
• Orpha code for the rare disease
• Appropriate verificationStatus

Genetic diagnosis

• Orpha code for the rare disease
• OMIM code (if available)
• Evidence link to MolGen resources
• Appropriate verificationStatus (usually "confirmed")

Optimal coding

• No redundant codes
• Context-appropriate use of HPO/OMIM
• Clear separation between clinical and genetic diagnosis
• Evidence linking appropriate to the diagnosis type

When to use ICD-10-GM for genetic diagnoses?

✅ ICD-10-GM useful for:

• Symptomatic patients
• Clinically manifest diseases
• When specific clinical subtypes are coded (e.g. CF with pulmonary manifestations)
• Diagnoses relevant to billing

❌ Omit ICD-10-GM for:

• Pure carriers without symptoms
• Predictive genetic tests
• Genetic variants of unclear significance (VUS)
• When ICD-10 offers no adequate specificity

Important note: excluded diagnoses

⚠️ MANDATORY: documentation of excluded diagnoses

Excluded diagnoses (refuted) MUST also be coded and documented!

This applies in particular to:

• Suspected diagnoses that were refuted
• Differential diagnoses that were excluded
• Negative genetic test results for suspected diseases

Coding excluded diagnoses

* verificationStatus = #refuted
* clinicalStatus = #inactive
* code.coding[orphanet] = // Orpha code of the excluded disease
* note.text = // justification of the exclusion

Why is this important?

• Avoiding redundant diagnostics: tests already performed are not repeated
• Complete documentation: the diagnostic process remains traceable
• Research: important for epidemiology and differential diagnostics
• Patient safety: prevents unnecessary examinations

Summary

Basic principle: as much as necessary, as little as possible

1. Clinical diagnosis: ICD-10-GM + Orpha + HPO
2. Genetic diagnosis: Orpha + OMIM (ICD-10-GM only if clinically relevant)
3. Excluded diagnosis: same coding + verificationStatus = refuted
4. SNOMED CT: only if it adds value
5. Other systems: only in justified exceptional cases

The choice of coding systems should take into account the context of the diagnosis (clinical vs. genetic) and the purpose (billing, research, registration).